How Long Does Sexual Abuse of a Child Stay On Your Record?
If you’ve been accused of sexual abuse of a child, sometimes called child molestation, it can have devastating effects on your family and your life. Your children can be taken away permanently and you can lose the right to spend time with any future children you have. These charges can even impact your job prospects. For that reason, one of the most common questions we are asked is how long these accusations will be present on your criminal record, and if you’re convicted how long you’ll carry the public record of that conviction.
In this brief article, a child abuse defense attorney in Tampa with our team at The Rickman Law Firm shares the statute of limitation on reporting child sexual abuse as well as how long you can expect a conviction or accusation to remain on your record.
What is the Statute of Limitations on Child Molestation Accusations?
“Claims founded on alleged abuse, or incest, may be commenced at any time within seven years after the age of majority, or within four years after the injured person leaves the dependency of the abuser, or within four years from the time of discovery by the injured party of both the injury and the causal relationship between the injury and the abuse, whichever occurs later. “For intentional torts based on abuse.”
Going a step further, H.B. 133:
“…provides that the act may be cited as the “43 Days Initiative Act.” This amends the statute of limitation law, s. 775.15, F.S., by extending the current statute of limitation time period for a first or second-degree felony sexual battery when the victim is 16 years of age or older and does not report the crime within 72 hours. The bill provides a statute of limitation of 8 years for these offenses instead of the previous 3 or 4 year time period. Under the bill, if a 16-year-old or older victim of second-degree felony sexual battery or an 18-year-old or older victim of first-degree felony sexual battery report the crime within 72 hours, current law is applicable and there is no time limitation for bringing a prosecution. The bill applies to any such offense except one already time-barred on or before July 1, 2015, meaning it applies retroactively to previously committed offenses as long as the statute of limitation has not run on these offenses prior to July 1, 2015.”
Can You Seal or Expunge Sexual Abuse of a Child from Your Record?
If convicted of a sex crime involving a minor, you will be unable to seal or expunge the conviction from your record. However, if you were accused but not found guilty, the charges and arrest may still show on your record until you file to have them sealed or expunged. This step is often underestimated in importance, but it can have negative consequences when applying for a job, loan, lease, or even a mortgage if your record shows an arrest for sexual abuse involving a child.
If you’ve been accused of child abuse of any kind, contact a child abuse defense lawyer in Tampa with The Rickman Law Firm. Your attorney will fight to protect your rights and the right to see your children by helping you understand the best defense available to you.
Disclaimer: The information contained in this article is for general educational information only. This information does not constitute legal advice, is not intended to constitute legal advice, nor should it be relied upon as legal advice for your specific factual pattern or situation.
NO CONVICTION FOR FELONY POSSESSION OF A CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE / POSSESSION OF DRUG WITHOUT A PRESCRIPTION
The Client was charged with Felony Possession of a Controlled Substance and Felony Possession of a Drug Without a Prescription. Attorney Anthony Rickman convinced the State not to prosecute and the charges were dismissed.
The Defendant was accused of DUI after being found asleep in her vehicle at a traffic light. The Defense was able to get the charges successfully dropped.
The Defendant inadvertently brought a handgun that was located in a gym bag into the airport. The firearm was discovered by security at a checkpoint. After demonstrating that the Defendant did not have knowledge that