Exploring Possible Defenses for a Murder Charge in Tampa

Attorney giving defense in courtroom during trial

Facing a murder charge in Tampa can be an overwhelming and frightening experience. Understanding the possible defenses available under Florida law can provide some clarity and direction. There are several potentially effective defenses that your Tampa homicide defense lawyer with The Rickman Law Firm can explore to defend against a murder charge.

Self-Defense

Under Florida Statutes, an individual is justified in using deadly force if they reasonably believe it is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to themselves or others. This “Stand Your Ground” law, allows individuals to defend themselves without the duty to retreat if they are present on legal grounds.

Defense of Others

Similar to self-defense, Florida law permits the use of deadly force to protect another person who is in imminent danger of being killed or seriously injured. The person defending another must have a reasonable belief that the use of force is necessary.

Lack of Intent

A key element of a murder charge is intent. For example, a first-degree murder charge must have a foundational element of premeditation. If the defense can demonstrate that there was no premeditated intent to kill, the charge could be reduced or dismissed. This could involve showing that the killing was accidental or occurred in the heat of passion without prior planning.

Alibi

An alibi defense provides evidence that the defendant was somewhere else when the crime occurred and therefore could not have committed the murder. This defense requires credible witnesses or evidence, such as video footage or electronic records, to substantiate the claim.

Duress or Coercion

Under certain circumstances, your Tampa homicide defense attorney with The Rickman Law Firm may argue that the act was committed under duress or coercion. Although typically more challenging to prove in murder cases, this defense contends that the individual was forced to commit the crime under threat of immediate danger to yourself or others, making your actions ultimately involuntary.

Mistaken Identity

Eyewitness misidentification is a common issue in criminal cases. Your attorney can argue that the defendant was mistakenly identified as the perpetrator. This could involve presenting evidence such as DNA, fingerprints, or surveillance footage proving the defendant’s absence from the crime scene.

Insufficient Evidence

The prosecution bears the burden of proving the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The defense can challenge the adequacy of the prosecution’s evidence, pointing out inconsistencies, lack of credible witnesses, or unreliable forensic evidence. By undermining the prosecution’s case, your Tampa homicide defense attorney can argue that there is not enough evidence to convict you of murder.

Your Attorney With The Rickman Law Firm Will Explore All Possible Defenses To Fight Your Murder Charge

Your homicide defense lawyer in Tampa with The Rickman Law Firm will work strategically to create the most effective defense strategy possible for your case.

Our office is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week for your convenience. For a free case consultation with one of our skilled attorneys, contact our office at (813) 370-1185 or fill out the consultation form on our website today.

Disclaimer: The information contained in this article is for general educational information only. This information does not constitute legal advice, is not intended to constitute legal advice, nor should it be relied upon as legal advice for your specific factual pattern or situation.

NEED A DEFENSE ATTORNEY?

Schedule Consultation

Case Results

DUI Reduced to Reckless Driving

Show More

VEHICULAR HOMICIDE INVESTIGATION CLOSED PRIOR TO ANY ARREST OR CHARGES FILED

The Client was being investigated by law enforcement for Vehicular Homicide after the Client was involved in an accident which resulted in the death of a passenger. Attorney Anthony Rickman was in communication
Show More

Violation of Probation Dimissed

Defendant was on felony probation for possession of controlled substance, and DUI. Despite testing positive for a controlled substance the court dismissed the violation of probation and terminated the defendant’s probation.
Show More